我开始认为这是不可能的,但是无论如何我都想问。
我想测试我的一个ES6模块以特定方式调用另一个ES6模块。有了茉莉花,这非常容易-
应用程式码:
// myModule.js
import dependency from './dependency';
export default (x) => {
dependency.doSomething(x * 2);
}
和测试代码:
//myModule-test.js
import myModule from '../myModule';
import dependency from '../dependency';
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
spyOn(dependency, 'doSomething');
myModule(2);
expect(dependency.doSomething).toHaveBeenCalledWith(4);
});
});
笑话相当于什么?我觉得这是一件很想做的简单的事,但是我一直在努力尝试弄清头发。
我最接近的是将import
s 替换为require
s,并将其移入测试/函数中。都不是我想做的事情。
// myModule.js
export default (x) => {
const dependency = require('./dependency'); // yuck
dependency.doSomething(x * 2);
}
//myModule-test.js
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
jest.mock('../dependency');
myModule(2);
const dependency = require('../dependency'); // also yuck
expect(dependency.doSomething).toBeCalledWith(4);
});
});
For bonus points, I'd love to make the whole thing work when the function inside dependency.js
is a default export. However, I know that spying on default exports doesn't work in Jasmine (or at least I could never get it to work), so I'm not holding out hope that it's possible in Jest either.